Sunday, April 15, 2012

Gumby Land Thinking

1. What is Gumby Land thinking? Give three illustrative examples of it.


Gumby Land thinking is simply the idea when a person creates a belief and many others believe in the same belief. This term comes from the popular animation made from clay, called Claymation "Gumby" which was a television show based on a little Claymation character named Gumby. The creator of Gumby, Art Clokey, apparently went to India for a short vacation while going through a difficult time period in his life, and brought along Gumby with him on his journey. He claimed that there was a change in his life after meeting a famous guru named Sathya Sai Baba. The guru sprinkled holy ashes on Gumby, and claimed that Gumby was an incarnation of spiritual love. The little character essentially had become a spiritual icon. Clockey then claimed that things started workout out for him after the encounter with the guru. Gumby became famous and popular once again, even helping Clockey sign an eight million dollar contract for the show. Back in India, where his experience first happened, a small shrine was put in place to the little character Gumby to worship it.

Here are some illustrations for Gumby Land thinking. When someone, without any clear evidence or basis, claims to have revived from the dead and people worshipped that person would be one form of Gumby Land thinking. Another would be when a house dog is somehow worshipped as the leader of this world because of this one claim from an unknown “prophet” that told everyone that dog will soon take over the world. Lastly, if a teacher were to say that the world is going to end in 10 days without any calculations or a foundational basis for that claim, and somehow many people believed it to be true. These are some examples of Gumby Land thinking.

We now realize that Gumby land thinking is meant to show how some people will believe anything. Personally for me, I thought that the very fact a shrine was put up for a little clay character that was human made was outrageous and insane. Some may argue that we cannot prove that Gumby is not the incarnation of spiritual love because it is not a scientifically testable concept. It was hard to think that some people actually believed what one person had said were the truth. This is where Gumby Land thinking’s idea shines. The concept that a person or group of people can just randomly bring up an idea and others will actually believe it because it sounds “good”, without being logical and giving any thought to the why and the origin of that idea, nor having any scientific proof to back up the idea. Gumby Land thinking sheds its lights in other religions as well. Because of the very reason that some idea cannot be proven, in this case that Gumby is an incarnation of spiritual love, scientists feel that then it doesn't exist. Because a person can come up with all sorts of outrageous ideas without a scientific foundation for its beliefs, it most definitely cannot be taken seriously.

Although I say when something cannot be scientifically proven, it is not true; we cannot generalize all religious beliefs as the same. There are clear differences between religion and Gumby Land thinking. Most definitely there are many religious ideas out there that can be clearly defined as made up and unreliable. However some religions and their ideas have much historical basis and unexplainable phenomena that even science cannot prove. The one main difference between religion and Gumby Land thinking is that religion has many phenomena and history that back up their beliefs, while Gumby Land thinking certainly do not have anything to “prove” its existence through anything. If a certain experience occurs that cannot be scientifically explained, it would not be right for scientists to say that it never happened because it cannot be proven or even tested. There are many phenomena and ideas out in the world that science certainly cannot explain… yet.  Because of our understanding right now of the world, we may say that many things have become thousand times easier to explain and actually relate. We cannot simply categorize some idea into “Gumby Land thinking” and say it is false just because it is just comical and outrageous, but consider it and actually take time to research and try to somehow prove its validity.

No comments:

Post a Comment